Non-Monotonic Reasoning with Logic Programming

نویسندگان

  • Luís Moniz Pereira
  • Joaquim Nunes Aparício
  • José Júlio Alferes
چکیده

Our purpose is to exhibit a modular systematic method of representing non{ monotonic reasoning problems with the Well Founded Semantics WFS of extended logic programs augmented with eXplicit negation (WFSX), augmented by its Contradiction Removal Semantics (CRSX) when needed. We apply this semantics, and its contradiction removal semantics counterpart, to represent non-monotonic reasoning problems. We show how to cast in the language of logic programs extended with explicit negation such forms of non-monotonic reasoning as defeasible reasoning, abductive reasoning and hypothetical reasoning and apply them to such di erent domains of knowledge representation as hierarchies and reasoning about actions. We then abstract a modular systematic method of representing non-monotonic problems in a logic programming semantics comprising two forms of negation avoiding some drawbacks of other proposals, with which we relate our work. 2

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Logic Programming for Non-Monotonic Reasoning

Our purpose is to exhibit a modular systematic method of representing nonmonotonic reasoning problems with the Well Founded Semantics of extended logic programs aumented with eXplicit negation (WFSX), augmented by its Contradiction Removal Semantics (CRSX) when needed. We show how to cast in the language of such logic programs forms of non-monotonic reasoning like defeasible reasoning and hypot...

متن کامل

An Assumption-Based Framework for Non-Monotonic Reasoning

The notion of assumption-based framework generalises and reenes the use of abduction to give a formalisation of non-monotonic reasoning. In this framework, a sentence is a non-monotonic consequence of a theory if it can be derived monotonically from a theory extended by means of acceptable assumptions. The notion of acceptability for such assumptions is formulated in terms of their ability succ...

متن کامل

G’3-Stable Semantics and Inconsistency Semantica G3'-Estable e Inconsistencia

We present an overview on how to perform non-monotonic reasoning based on paraconsistent logics. In particular, we show that one can define a logic programming semantics based on the paraconsistent logic G’3 which is called G’3-stable semantics. This semantics defines a frame for performing non-monotonic reasoning in domains which are pervaded with vagueness and inconsistencies. In fact, we sho...

متن کامل

A Hybrid Approach to Inference in Probabilistic Non-Monotonic Logic Programming

We present a probabilistic inductive logic programming framework which integrates non-monotonic reasoning, probabilistic inference and parameter learning. In contrast to traditional approaches to probabilistic Answer Set Programming (ASP), our framework imposes only comparatively little restrictions on probabilistic logic programs in particular, it allows for ASP as well as FOL syntax, and for ...

متن کامل

Argumentation-Based Proof Procedures for Credulous and Sceptical Non-monotonic Reasoning

We define abstract proof procedures for performing credulous and sceptical non-monotonic reasoning, with respect to the argumentation-theoretic formulation of non-monotonic reasoning proposed in [1]. Appropriate instances of the proposed proof procedures provide concrete proof procedures for concrete formalisms for non-monotonic reasoning, for example logic programming with negation as failure ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • J. Log. Program.

دوره 17  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1993